RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03788
COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
After he served his time, he was transferred to Florida and on
6 May 1960, he was honorably discharged.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
Certification of Military Service.
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Air Force from 2 Sep 1955 through
22 May 1957. His service was terminated by a BCD.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Air Force Office of Special
Investigation determined a criminal record does not exist.
On 25 Apr 2014, a request for post-service information was
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office. (Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFLOA/JAJM states that if AFPC confirms that the member received
an honorable discharge, the Board should set-aside his BCD. On
18 Jan 1957, a special-court martial convicted the applicant, in
accordance with his plea, of absenting himself from his
organization from 15 Sep 1956 to 3 Jan 1957 without proper
authority, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military
Justice. The member was sentenced to be discharged from the
service with a BCD, to forfeit $55.00 per month for six months, and
to be confined at hard labor for six months. On 25 Jan 1957, the
convening authority approved the BCD, forfeiture of $55.00 per
month for five months, and confinement for five months.
On 26 Feb 1957, the Air Force Board of Review found the approved
finding of guilty and the sentence correct in law and fact. On
22 Apr 1957, the convening authority ordered the sentence executed,
but suspended the BCD for the period of confinement and 12 months
thereafter, at which time the BCD would be remitted unless sooner
vacated. There is nothing within the record of trial indicating
that the suspended BCD was ever vacated. Therefore, if AFPC
confirms that the member received an honorable discharge, we
believe the Board should set-aside BCD.
The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. Based on the presumption of
regularity, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was
within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant
did not provide any evidence that an error or injustice occurred
with the processing of his discharge. They cannot confirm the
circumstances and facts surrounding the applicant's discharge and
must rely on the information provided by the Military Justice
Division regarding the court-martial and the presumption of
regularity regarding the discharge.
The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 14 Mar 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by
this office (Exhibit F).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We note this
Board is without authority to reverse, set aside, or otherwise
expunge a court-martial conviction. Rather, in accordance with
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552(f), our actions are
limited to corrections to the record to reflect actions taken by
the reviewing officials and action on the sentence of the court-
martial for the purpose of clemency. We find no evidence which
indicates the applicants service characterization, which had
its basis in his court-martial conviction and was a part of the
sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded
the limitations set forth in the UCMJ. We note that on 22 Apr
1957, the convening authority ordered the sentence executed, but
suspended the BCD for the period of confinement and 12 months
thereafter, at which time the BCD would be remitted unless sooner
vacated. However, there is nothing within the record of trial
indicating that the suspended BCD was ever vacated. Should the
applicant provide the evidence noted above we would be willing
to review his case for possible reconsideration. We considered
upgrading the discharge on the basis of clemency; however, after
considering the applicant's overall quality of service, the
court-martial conviction which precipitated the discharge, the
seriousness of the offenses of which convicted, and noting the
lack of documentation pertaining to his post-service activities,
we cannot conclude that clemency is warranted. In view of the
above, we cannot recommend approval based on the current
evidence of record.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2013-
03788 in Executive Session on 5 Jun 2014, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
, Chair
, Member
, Member
?
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2013-
03788 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Aug 2013, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, digitally signed 25 Apr 2014,
w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 5 Feb 2014.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 24 Feb 2014.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Mar 2014.
Chair
4
4
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00653
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, stating, in part, that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the character of service was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFLOA/JAJM recommends approval,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc 2013 02696
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his characterization of service. AFPC/DPSOY will provide the applicant with a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with a RE code of 2B, unless otherwise directed by the Board. Regarding his request to change his RE code, we note that DPSOA states his RE code was recorded in error and we agree with their recommendation to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00829
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00829 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge. On 12 Nov 61, the applicant was furnished an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge and was credited with two years, eight...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04646
A complete copy of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicants request to change her name on the DD Form 214, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, after a thorough review of the evidence provided, we cannot conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05855
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. His punishment consisted of forfeiture of $100.00 of pay per month for two months and a reduction to the grade of airman, suspended until 5 March 1973, at which time, unless the suspension was sooner vacated, it would be remitted without further action. On 28 February 1974, the applicant was furnished with a BCD, and was credited with 2 years, 3 months, and 3 days of active service, excluding lost time from 5 April 1973 to 9...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03229
JAJM states that upgrading the applicants BCD is not appropriate and recommends the Board deny the request as untimely or on the merits. It also indicates that a bad conduct discharge is more than merely a service characterization; it is a punishment for the crimes the applicant committed while a member of the armed forces. While JAJM states that a BCD is for bad conduct and more than merely a service characterization, all his charges stemmed from one incident.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01667
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01667 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed a waiver of the minimum retirement time in service and granted special retirement to support his family or be allowed entry into the Return to Duty Program (RTDP). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04685
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force erroneously cancelled his approved retirement when he was placed under investigation prior to his retirement date. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03217
The military judge sentenced the applicant to be discharged from the Air Force with a BCD, confined for six months, and to be reduced to the grade of Amn. On 10 Feb 2005, the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals concluded that the approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that there is no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the applicant. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00181
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00181 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official records be corrected to reflect the following changes on his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty: 1. On 2 Jul 10, the applicant was dismissed from the Air Force, with uncharacterized service and a narrative reason for separation of Court Martial, and was credited with 14 years, 6...